The home falls within the zone of privacy,at least that is what one would think.My first admendment activity was unreaonably infringed upon by statutes that unreasonably regulate the time place and manner of speech.The right of privacy is a fundemental consitutional right,it is not a trivial administrative police regulation. Criminal tresspass charges and breaking and entering charges would be filed against home invaders of other sorts, instead the likly hood is that this new evolution of law enforcement has cops no longer thinking except thinking they are superman that is. Night calm has meaning to a society,that is different then the police who with an increasing presence of military equipment,training and tactics blur the lines between warefare and law enforcement.IT used to be that a law enforcement officer would brag I did 32 years and only drew my gun 4 times.Now with the role of swat training even street officers draw up to 4 times a
day. A dynamic entry is to law enforcement what the military calls martial law mental conditioning operations.I am not an american terrorist. William Douglas said "we deal with a right of privacy older the the bill of rights ,older then our political parties, older then our school system." This no knock and announce attitude emboldens law enforcement and conditions them to expand their authority where they had none before. Why should we be afraid of local law enforcement. The belief by some that all they are are city sanctioned Revenuers and gang members,is why criminals expect assaults from the police.And a homeowner is saying why would the police be kicking in my door. Legal protections must be removed for this behavior,which are to notify the persons inside of the presence of police and the empending intrusion and giving that person time to respond avoid violence and to protect privacy as much as possible.A quick knock followed by law
enforcements yell of police and then kicking in the door is reserved for a warrent. but to kick the door in guns drawn comply or die is death by no knock,and a home defendor in no knock raids are victims.Law enforcement hits the door fully expecting an armed murder suspect on the other side .Firm and polite was what confronted law enforcements use of deadly force,(only used if it is a dangerous felony)I was using non deadly force when i requested his supervisor, and demanded law enforcement to leave my home, under these circumstances the commission of a proscribed act(resist arrest) is viewed by society as justified and hence not appropriate for criminal punishment.An act dune under duress(stating my rights and for law enforcement to leave my home now.)could have escalated into a sort of anarchy. The kids don't follow the law. Some of the police don't follow the law. The people in the community are afraid of all the crime, but the kids
aren't going to respect the police when they are operating in the same way the criminals do. The horror of it is this taints all the other officers out there who do good work.''The courts must see the red flags.It's a tremendous problem of supervision and discipline, and it's a microcosm of the whole department.law enforcement seems to be saying, `We don't need no stinkin' warrants,. `In the guise of this search for homicide suspects,gun shots, loud noises ,you name it they have become the door-kickers, the illegal searchers, the guys that just don't care, and their commanders don't appear to be particularly fastidious as to how it's all done. Nobody should have the right to suspend all the rules.When law enforcement broke down my door of my private residence and when I objected charged me with resisting arresst it was easy to think that law enforcement viewed the neighborhood as enemies,and keeping them in their place was the best policy
,conscious political strategy of the mayor and law enforcement?Or issues law enforcement are going to have to deal with more traditional-type policing and that law enforcemrnt are not very good at engaging the community they have more of a fortress type mentality.
Training law enforcement is singly the most important contribution to changing the way the department thinks about it work and must spend enormous effort and resources developing new training programs.Law enforcement has to build confidence, and has to be accountable, “that well-intentioned lie that the police have been relying on for so long, ‘If you’ve got a problem, you call me, I’ll fix it’”-Are now viewed as enforcers who were unleashed to administer curbside justice.'' "This is an attempt on behalf of the police to deploy a less rigorous regime than that which the statute intended." In a press conference, Calvo, surrounded by county elected leaders and friends, states "We have witnessed a frightening law enforcement culture in which the law is disregarded, the rights of innocent occupants are ignored and the rights of innocent animals mean nothing. A shadow was cast over our good names. We were harmed by the very people who
took an oath to protect us. T

Dhimmitude -- What does it mean?
Obama used it in the health care bill.

Now isn't this interesting? It is used in the health care law.

Dhimmitude -- I had never heard the word until now. Type it into Google and start reading. Pretty interesting. It's on page 107 of the healthcare bill. I looked this up on Google and yep, it exists.. It is a REAL word.

Word of the Day: Dhimmitude

Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam.

ObamaCare allows the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States . Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be "gambling", "risk-taking", and "usury" and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this.

How convenient. So I, as a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivables, and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance. Non-Muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. This is Dhimmitude.

I recommend sending this onto your contacts. American citizens need to know about it