I'd like the panel to discuss ...

'Cracking the Code' by Pete Hendrickson

Pete Hendrickson has literally 'cracked the Internal Revenue Code' by performing exhaustive searches to discover that Private Sector receipts are not subject to Federal Income taxes - this is huge! His information has helped readers to receive over $9 million in refunds from the IRS.

10,681 votes
Sign in
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    anonymousanonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →


    Sign in
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      • lawfulmoneylawfulmoney commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Congrats to the Greeks! for standing up to the Banksters.

        It's official...the little country of Greece has FINALLY stood up to the Bad Guy Banksters and told them that if they want to Bail Out the European banking system they are going to have to do it without loading Greece up with more debt!

        And that is exactly what the ECB will do.

        Everyone knows that over 95% of the bailout money that Greece has "borrowed" so far has gone directly to the banks and institutions that lent them money in the first place and now Greece has said no more.

        Now we will see Mario Draghi open the flood gates on direct banking bailouts with massive QE of Euros before the final plunge into the darkness that awaits us all in the next few months.

        If you are in Greece - it's anyone's guess as to what happens now. Greece has many choices but whatever they choose they have to move quickly as the people will get over their euphoria of standing up to the Banksters and realize they are in deep shit without their banks open for commerce.

        I think a good temporary option is to flood their own system with Euros that the Greek National Bank can print from their Euro Printing Presses! It may be "against international law" in Europe but HA!, HA!, HA! on the other members of the EU. When it comes to stopping the printing of Greek Euros what's the rest of the EU going to do...bomb Athens??

        At the end of the day - We The People have the moral high ground and the days of the Banking Cabal are numbered.

        Stay tuned ...

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        THIS IS THE BANKSTER'S GREATEST FEAR -- Harley Schlanger

        ".. the Greek govt has confounded the so-called 'experts' who had assumed they would capitulate. Because that's what countries do. Countries, when faced with the power of international banks, give in, and accept austerity and sacrifice their people for the sake of a little bit of liquidity. The Greeks have drawn a line.

        This debt that Greece allegedly owes ... is a fraud. It was initially generated by a Goldman Sachs scam to qualify the Greeks for the Eurozone. GS offered bonds and then sold those bonds to their clients and then bet against them. And then forced the Greeks by lowering the value of these bonds to have to go in the market to buy insurance, CDS and so on. As became clear, the Greek economy could not support this level of debt, the IMF the European Union and the ECB moved in & started loaning money, doing the bailout in which the $ did not go to the Greek government. Less than 4% of the $260 billion in loans ended up in the hands of the Greek government. 96% went straight to the banks,"

      • jesse jamesjesse james commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        CtC doesnt work because it doesnt reflect the law in any way shape or form.
        You pay federal taxes on your labor earnings because you participate in Social Security.

        Take a look at your W2. Box 1 (3401(a) "wages") is always the same as box 3 (3121(a) "wages") as is box 5 (medicare wages). All three are equal.

        Take a look at section 3401(a) "wages" without being influenced by Pete Hendrickson CtC theory. Let the law expplain itself.
        3401(a)(2) is all you need to read to understand that 3121(a) "wages" are the same as 3401(a) "wages". The only difference between the two is that chapter 21 is about SS taxes and chapter 24 is about withholding and deduction.....its really that simple.

        Heres 3401(a)(2)

        (2)for agricultural labor (as defined in section 3121(g)) unless the remuneration paid for such labor is wages (as defined in section 3121(a)); or

        Ok lets break this down. 3401(a)(2) is actually an exclusion to 3401(a) "wages". Meaning (and all of you get this competely wrong) that 3121(g) earnings are not, by law, deemed 3401(a) "wages".
        (Read the last sentence of 3401(a) "opening paragraph....."shall not include")
        Now what 3401(a)(2) is saying is normally 3121(g) is not to be lumped into the definition to 3401(a) 'wages" unless these 3121(g) "wages" are deemed as 3121(a) "wages".....do you understand?

      • JohntheConnoristJohntheConnorist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        johnthetaxist, did you have a good weekend? Or were you too busy looking for Isis and worrying about Greece? 6 more months?

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Johnny Didn't Let the Man Get Him

        Now, when I was just a little boy,
        Standing to my Daddy's knee,
        My poppa said, "Son, don't let the man get you
        Do what he done to me."

        'Cause he'll get ya,
        'Cause he'll get ya, now, now.
        And I can remember the 4th of July,
        Running through the backwood, bare.

        And I can still hear my old hound dog barking,
        Chasin' down a hoodoo there.
        Chasin' down a hoodoo there.


      • JohntheConnoristJohntheConnorist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Ken, good stuff. It's all simple. Well back in 1862 it had to be since a Secretary or General or whatever title would know first-hand who is being paid that privilege. It was their DUTY to self assess and return a tax for being paid by the Peoples money. Or something like that.
        jesse james & i discussed this at length. He doesn't totally agree with me nor i him. For calculation purposes, an employer (common term) uses ones earnings as wages to get the amount of tax as seen in 26 USC 3111. It's a Social Security link scheme. Because SS is a Gov privilege & one signs up for it (in ignorance and coercion) on W-4 forms etc. The tax laws in 1939 were revised to include SS. That's where the income tax hike began. Then in 1942 of course the war and everyone flooded with tax forms without reading or knowing definitions or feeling patriotic just went along to get along. That's why SS wages is on a W-2 twice. sorry to get long winded. But yes there is a presumption one has 'income' all because of the dang erroneous reporting on every parties part.

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Greek "Yes" Vote Will Add a Few More Weeks to Their Survival

        Troika Maneuvering to Rig Greek Referendum

        "Yet through all of this, there is no hope because those in power are clueless. The Troika refuse to solve the Euro Crisis because the Troika only see their own self-interest and assume they can force their will upon all the people. The Troika are doing everything in their power now to rig the Greek Referendum to make it appear the Greek people want Brussels. The Troika have deliberately closed the banks to punish the people of Greece and to show them what exiting the Euro means. This appears to be their only way of diverting the crisis with orchestrating a fake YES vote to economic suicide. The Troika will attempt to rig the referendum as they did with the Scottish elections. So expect vote counting to be biased in favor of a YES vote stay in the Euro. As Stalin said, elections are decided not by voters, but by those who count the votes."

      • JohntheConnoristJohntheConnorist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The banksters know deep down they're here to benefit man. That's why so many (allegedly) commit suicide. Just like Judas, it makes them go nuts knowing they've violated that moral law.
        JohnTT, show us on the doll where a banker touched you.

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The USDollar is on a collision course with imminent death. It is utterly amazing that so many supposedly smart analysts and highly paid wealth managers cannot see the obvious path on which the US [FR] Dollar treads, limps, and struts proudly, dangerously, and abusively, suspended by numerous false cables and tethers.

        The US [Federal Reserve] Dollar cannot be sustained in its current form or on its present course. The abuse of its management and stewardship will be told in history books (possibly with certain chapters scribed by the Jackass).

        The aggressive defense of the US Dollar includes criminal activity on a widespread scale never witnessed before.

        It is a veritable global money war, not so much a global financial crisis. The system, centered upon the US Dollar, is collapsing under its own insolvency and corrupt underpinnings amidst the din of war.

        The truth is almost nowhere to be seen.

        The US Govt. is demanding that allies support the global currency reserve, even though doing so guarantees a financial structure collapse and an economic breakdown. The safe haven is Gold & Silver, in the form of bars & coins, kept secure outside all nations that speak English, and outside nations that are closely allied with the US Fed and US Dept. Treasury which operate like a vast crime syndicate.

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Things have been relatively quiet in the financial world for so long that many have been sucked into a false sense of security. FRNs continue to work as money, retirement accounts have grown larger year to year. But the underlying imbalances were always there, and they've been getting worse over time.

        We're heading into a global financial collapse that will make what happened in 2008 look like a Sunday picnic by the time it is all said and done.

        Global debt levels are at all-time highs, big banks all over the planet have been behaving more recklessly than ever, and financial markets are absolutely primed for a huge crash. Need I remind you of these Black Days . . .

        Wall St Stock Market Crash: Oct. 1929 https://youtu.be/RJpLMvgUXe8
        Black Monday: Oct. 1987 http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/49476696
        Black Wednesday: 1997 https://youtu.be/K_oET45GzMI
        Stock Market Crash of 2008: https://youtu.be/dkVMTxJMHqE
        Collapse of Sept. 2015: Triggered by . . . ?

      • Ken SeaburyKen Seabury commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        It's interesting that you brought up 26 U.S.C. § 6331(a), which is merely the current codification of the actual law in Sec. 3310 of Volume 53 of the Statutes at Large, and only mentions "monthly returns," and "returns for which no provision [regarding filing time] is otherwise made." Section 3310 does not mention simple annual filers of Forms 1040.

        Here's what SCOTUS and lower Federal courts say about this:

        "By 1 U.S.C. § 54 (a) [now 1 U.S.C. § 204(a)], the Code establishes "prima facie" the laws of the United States. But the very meaning of "prima facie" is that the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent."
        *Stephan v. United States,* 319 US 423 - Supreme Court (1943)

        ”We note that the statute as codified in the United States Code refers to "any form of reconsiderations," with the last word being in the plural. The version of § 10(c) as currently enacted, however, uses the singular "reconsideration." See this note, supra, at 138. We quote the text as enacted in the Statutes at Large. See Stephan v. United States, 319 U. S. 423, 426 (1943) ("[T]he Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent").”
        *Darby v. Cisneros,* 509 U.S. 137 - Supreme Court (1993)

        "Much of defendant's argument rests on language that has been quoted from the United States Code, rather than from the law itself. The Code establishes prima facie what the laws of the United States are. It is so provided in section 204, title 1, of the Code. Section 112, title 1, of the Code provides, however, that *the United States Statutes at Large "shall be legal evidence of laws* * * * in all the courts of the United States * * *."
        *Best Foods v. United States,* 147 F. Supp. 749 - Customs Court, 3rd Div. (1956)

        "But no one denies that the official source to find United States laws is the Statutes at Large and that the Code is only prima facie evidence of such laws."
        *Royer's, Inc. v. United States,* 265 F. 2d 615 - Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit (1959)

        "Unless Congress affirmatively enacts a title of the United States Code into law, that title is only "prima facie" evidence of the law, see 1 U.S.C. § 204(a) (1982); "the very meaning of `prima facie' is that the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent.""
        *Preston v. Heckler,* 734 F. 2d 1359 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit (1984)

        This is a link to Cornell's Legal Information Institute:


        Congress has provided us with the Derivations of Code Sections for this specific purpose, here's a link:


        The link below provides us the text of the actual body of law from which today's I.R.C. derives its authority, Volume 53 of the Statutes at Large:


        Here's the actual text of Section 3310:


        (a) MONTHLY RETURNS.—All returns required to be made monthly by any person liable to tax shall be made on or before the 10th day of each month, and the tax assessed or due thereon shall be returned by the Commissioner to the collector on or before the last day of each month.

        (b) OTHER RETURNS.—All returns for which no provision is otherwise made shall be made on or before the 10th day of the month succeeding the time when the tax is due and liable to be assessed, and the tax thereon shall be returned as herein provided for monthly returns, and shall be due and payable on or before the last day of the month in which the assessment is so made.

        (c) ADDITION TO TAX IN CASE OF NONPAYMENT.—When the said tax is not paid on or before the last day of the month, as aforesaid, the collector shall add a penalty of 5 per centum, together with interest at the rate of 6 per centum per annum, upon such tax from the time the same became due; but no interest for a fraction of a month shall be demanded: Provided, That notice of the time when such tax becomes due and payable is given in such manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner.

        (d) DEMAND FOR TAX, PENALTY, AND INTEREST.—It shall then be the duty of the collector, in case of the nonpayment of said tax on or before the last day of the month, as aforesaid, to demand payment thereof, with 5 per centum added thereto, and interest at the rate of 6 per centum per annum, as aforesaid, in the manner prescribed by law; and

        (e) DISTRAINT.—If said tax, penalty, and interest, are not paid within ten days after such demand, it shall be lawful for the collector or his deputy to make distraint therefor, as provided by law.

      • JohntheConnoristJohntheConnorist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Also Ken, notice in the certificate assessment it wasn't a verified claim. It stated 'certified'. Also notice the part about being a U.S. Individual income tax. Doesn't appear Peter or Doreen are U.S. Individuals especially based on the described in 6331(a).

      • Ken SeaburyKen Seabury commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate


        For the IRS to lawfully obtain bank records, it must have, and work with, *conclusive evidence in the record* in the form of a 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificate of Assessment indicating a balance of greater than zero (0), along with "supporting list(s) or record(s)." It's important to remember that the IRS is subject to the limitations of its lawful authority as underscored in our Federal tax laws and in the rules and procedures as prescribed by the Secretary. Certificates of Assessment are completed by Assessment Officers at the U.S. Treasury, who only have access to records originating from our Federal government, e.g., Federal payroll records and pension systems, Federally-licensed activities such as tobacco producers, distilleries, breweries, weapons and ammunition manufacturers, etc. This list is by no means exhaustive. These entities would have a "supporting list or record" for a 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificate of Assessment for a given tax year, indicating a balance of greater than zero (0).

        Erroneous information returns originate from private-sector workplaces and other non-Federally-connected payers and are correctable in the form and manner as prescribed by the Secretary.

        Here's what the Secretary tells us in the Treasury Regulations:

        26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1

        The district director and the director of the regional service center shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment. *The amount of the assessment shall, in the case of tax shown on a return by the taxpayer, be the amount so shown,* and in all other cases the amount of the assessment shall be the amount shown on the supporting list or record. The date of the assessment is the date the summary record is signed by an assessment officer. If the taxpayer requests a copy of the record of assessment, he shall be furnished a copy of the pertinent parts of the assessment which set forth the name of the taxpayer, the date of assessment, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amounts assessed.


        Our Federal courts have weighed in on this, as well:

        "For the condition precedent of liability to be met, *there must be a lawful assessment, either a voluntary one by the taxpayer or one procedurally proper by the IRS.* Because this country's income tax system is based on *voluntary self-assessment,* rather than distraint, *Flora v. United States,* 362 U.S. 145, 176, 80 S.Ct. 630, 646-47, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960), *the Service may assess the tax only in certain circumstances and in conformity with proper procedures."*
        *Bothke v. Terry,* 713 F. 2d 1405, at 1414 (1983).


        Here's what the 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificates of Assessment and IRS Account Transcripts of a typical CtC Warrior looks like, with zero (0) and negative balances:

        The IRS is an administrative agency *strictly* bound to administrative rules and procedures. Again, if information returns have been lawfully corrected, in the form and manner as prescribed by the Secretary, the IRS has no evidence to act upon, Social Security numbers notwithstanding.


        Thank you for the kind words, but the lion's share of the material in my YouTube comments were from the http://losthorizons website and CtC, which were instrumental in debating RetSquid.

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        16 Facts About The Tremendous Financial Devastation

        As we enter the second half of 2015, financial panic has gripped most of the globe. Stock prices are crashing in China, in Europe and in the United States. Greece is on the verge of a historic default, and now Puerto Rico and Ukraine are both threatening to default on their debts if they do not receive concessions from their creditors. Not since the financial crisis of 2008 has so much financial chaos been unleashed all at once. Could it be possible that the great financial crisis of 2015 has begun? The following are 16 facts about the tremendous financial devastation that is happening all over the world right now…

        1. On Monday, the Dow fell by 350 points. That was the biggest one day decline that we have seen in two years.

        2. In Europe, stocks got absolutely smashed. Germany’s DAX index dropped 3.6 percent, and France’s CAC 40 was down 3.7 percent.

        3. After Greece, Italy is considered to be the most financially troubled nation in the eurozone, and on Monday Italian stocks were down more than 5 percent.


        17. The large number of homeowners who stopped paying their mortgages.

        18. The large number of former taxpayers who discovered fiat currency income is "taxable income" and began redeeming Lawful Money instead, thus avoiding the bankers' income tax altogether.

      • JohntheConnoristJohntheConnorist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The corporation known as U.S. & those contracting with it are having issues. We the People of America will be fine. Although we will feel the pain of the U.S. Corporation cancer dying since it has spread abroad asserting itself into areas it really has no right to be.

      • johnthetaxistjohnthetaxist commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Looking at the bright side of things can be a very difficult thing at times. In the United States of America, it has never been harder than right now.

        We are being stripped of our liberty, our freedom and our assets. Our governing bodies are all bought and paid for and our land, water and food is purposefully being polluted and destroyed. We are even forcing our will upon other nations and other people who want just as much to be free in their own countries. There has never been a worse time to be living as an American.

        Having said that - there has never been a better time in the history of our country where the will and desire to overthrow our leaders has been stronger! We still think we are a FREE People and with that understanding embedded in our hearts and minds, when the time comes, we WILL stand up and overthrow our current controllers.

        It is written in the very fabric of our Founding Documents. In the Declaration of Independence and We the People will once again rise up and meet the challenge that our Founding Fathers placed on our shoulders:

        "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

        - Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

        So don't give up and don't despair. We are being prepped for the final battle as we will be in such dire straits in the upcoming Global Monetary Meltdown that we will do what the US Treasury and Federal Reserve wrote in GOLD lettering on the new $100 Bills...


      ← Previous 1 3 4 5 442 443

      Feedback and Knowledge Base