I'd like the panel to discuss ...

Shepard Smith - Never Have This Tool on the Show Again!

"America does not torture."

We want to hear the truth and law from Judge Napolitano, not the regular Fox News propaganda and deception from likes of Shepard Smith.

Never invite Shepard Smith on the show again!

17 votes
Vote 0 votes Vote Vote
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service

    You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    anonymousanonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  shelly.rocheAdminshelly.roche (Admin, Freedom Watch on Fox) responded  · 

    Re-posting Nick’s comment:
    Shep’s statement was ideological, not factual. That is, he wasn’t saying, “No, the U.S. government has not tortured anyone.” He was saying, “American ideology is inconsistent with torture, and the U.S. government ought not to torture anyone.”
    -shelly

    2 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service

      You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Aaron MillerAaron Miller commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        It's sometimes suggested that the Constitution prohibits torture under the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause, but torture is a means of interrogation and not punishment. However, Part 3, Section 1, Article 17 of the Geneva Convention does prohibit not only torture but even "any other form of coercion" in relation to prisoners of war. The U.S. signed that treaty, right? That puts us in an awkward position.

        Morally speaking, prohibition of coerced interrogation doesn't make sense. I think both Democrats and Republicans are generally wrong on this issue. I dislike how Republicans submit to political word games by supporting "interrogation" but saying "torture" is inherently immoral. I would define "torture" as deliberate infliction of pain, and I believe that is the common sense definition that all Americans instinctively know. Torture can be as mild as sensory deprivation or sensory overload (such as blaring music / noise loudly nonstop for days), or torture can be as severe as cutting and drowning. In any case, there is risk of long-term effects, but also opportunity for aid in the healing process afterward. Politicians ought to publicly admit that some forms of torture are acceptable while others are not.

        Another consideration when considering torture is how our actions reflect a hedonist disposition. Most people are more likely to reject physical torture than psychological tortures, even if those physical methods leave no physical scars after mere weeks or months.

      • NickNick commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I think Shep's statement was ideological, not factual. That is, he wasn't saying, "No, the U.S. government has not tortured anyone." He was saying, "American ideology is inconsistent with torture, and the U.S. government ought not to torture anyone."

      Knowledge Base and Helpdesk