13 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Peace and Love commented  ·  November 13, 2010 12:54 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  ZOE has been a gift of Heaven to all ofus that share it....
  There is a reason for everything....We are allone in our Love of ZOE and proud to be a part of it

• schwagaholic commented  ·  November 13, 2010 9:24 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Please help us save our land and our home. we all love this place soooo much and want to see it survive.

• Danielle commented  ·  November 12, 2010 6:58 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Love, Peace, Zoe♥ We will live on throught the music. It will take is there.

• Danielle commented  ·  November 12, 2010 6:57 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Love, Peace, Zoe♥ We will live on throught the music. It will take is there.

• Josh Carter commented  ·  November 12, 2010 4:00 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Chris, get your facts straight. The federal government is only required to show a "preponderance of evidence" that this property was used in a crime--they don't even have to prove that a crime was committed, much less "beyond a reasonable doubt".

  This is akin to the federal government suing Camp Zoe, as opposed to them being prosecuted for any crime, which is an affront to due process in a free society. If this is what you think of as "due process", you would feel more politically comfortable in China.

• will krzeszinski commented  ·  November 12, 2010 11:39 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Wasting money on a war on drugs is just as justified as sending police after religious groups for spreading ignorance. That doesn't happen. And I'm not saying it should.

• chris commented  ·  November 12, 2010 11:13 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  That's what the hearing if for is to prove the case or not depending on the evidence.

• Ryan C. Underwood commented  ·  November 12, 2010 11:02 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Chris, you're a dope. Due process, in all of Western legal tradition, means "innocent until proven guilty". Asset forfeiture is not "due process" just because a government court and police is carrying it out and calling it that.

• Denny commented  ·  November 12, 2010 10:41 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Chris, you are correct. I made this post in haste while reading some commentary elsewhere and somehow that got into the title here. Regardless, this is still an issue I would like to see Judge Napolitano cover on Freedom Watch.

• matthew esmar commented  ·  November 12, 2010 9:53 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  leave zoe alone and go bust a meth lab.
  there's plenty of them in that part of mo.

• Lana Mae commented  ·  November 12, 2010 9:46 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Free Camp Zoe!!!

• chris commented  ·  November 12, 2010 9:26 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Get your facts straight. No seizure will take place before Jimmy and his attorney has had an opportunity to put their case before a Federal judge. Even if the ruling goes against him, the seizure order will likely be stayed while the matter is on appeal. Both of these opportunities are what is meant by "due process."

• Theresa Friel commented  ·  November 12, 2010 9:19 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Save camp zoe!